Commission Action: Continued in Accreditation

The Commission determined that the institution remains in substantial compliance with the Commission’s Standards for Accreditation as a result of its review of the institution’s self-study, the report of the evaluation team, and the response of the institution to the team report. The institution was continued in accreditation as the result of this comprehensive evaluation. The judgment of “being in substantial compliance” or “being out of compliance” with the Standards for Accreditation is a qualitative judgment made by the Commission, consisting of peers and members of the public that the institution meets the underlying purpose of the standard. In making this judgment the Commission gives principal attention  to the statement of the standard for each of the Commission’s Standards for Accreditation.

Top